Personal shopper (Jastip) and the representation of digital workers: A critical study of social media discourse in the gig economy
Abstract
Personal shoppers (jastip) have emerged as informal digital workers within the gig economy, often promoted on social media as flexible and empowering entrepreneurial practices. However, behind this narrative lies a condition of precarity and limited labor protection. This study examines how the representation of jastip workers is discursively constructed on Instagram using Fairclough’s Critical Discourse Analysis. Adopting a critical qualitative approach, this research combines textual analysis, virtual ethnography, and interviews to analyze captions, visual elements, emojis, testimonials, and interaction patterns. The findings reveal that digital identity is constructed through affective language, visual consistency, and trust-oriented expressions, which serve as performative strategies to establish credibility. Participatory communication practices, such as live sessions and testimonial reposts, co-produce legitimacy while intensifying relational labor. At the level of social practice, these representations are embedded within the ideological logic of the gig economy and digital neoliberalism, where flexibility and productivity are emphasized while structural vulnerability remains obscured. This study highlights how platform logic and discourse shape trust, identity, and labor relations in informal digital work.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abidin, C. (2020). Mapping internet celebrity on TikTok: Exploring attention economies and visibility labours. Cultural Science Journal, 12(1), 77–103. https://doi.org/10.5334/csci.140
Alauddin, F. D. A., Aman, A., Ghazali, M. F., & Daud, S. (2025). The influence of digital platforms on gig workers: A systematic literature review. Heliyon, 11(1), e41491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41491
Banet-Weiser, S. (2018). Empowered. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv11316rx
Benlahcene, A. (2021). The process of qualitative interview: Practical insights for novice researchers. June, 405–413. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2021.06.02.52
Bucher, T. (2020). The algorithmic imaginary: exploring the ordinary affects of Facebook algorithms. Information, Communication & Society, 20(1), 30–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1154086
Dorschel, R. (2022). Reconsidering digital labour: Bringing tech workers into the debate. New Technology, Work and Employment, 37(2), 288–307. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12225
Duffy, B. E., Poell, T., & Nieborg, D. B. (2019). Platform practices in the cultural industries: Creativity, labor, and citizenship. Social Media and Society, 5(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119879672
Fairclough, N. (2015). Critical discourse analysis. Bloomsbury Companion to Discourse Analysis, 38–53. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780748680801-025
Fairclough, N. (2023). Technologization of discourse. In Texts and Practices Revisited (pp. 27–42). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003272847
Fitirana, R., Fuad, F., & Machmud, A. (2019). Perlindungan hukum terhadap konsumen pengguna jasa transportasi online. Jurnal Hukum Jurisdictie, 1(2), 13–33. https://doi.org/10.34005/jhj.v1i2.13
Gandini, A. (2021). Digital labour: an empty signifier? Media, Culture and Society, 43(2), 369–380. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443720948018
Graham, M., Hjorth, I., & Lehdonvirta, V. (2017). Digital labour and development: impacts of global digital labour platforms and the gig economy on worker livelihoods. Transfer, 23(2), 135–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/1024258916687250
Haya, L., & Diniati, A. (2024). Social media content management on Instagram in the fashion industry. Jurnal ASPIKOM, 9(1), 29–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.24329/aspikom.v9i1.1407
Himani Srihita, R., Goli, G., Rajyalaxmi, M., & Gobinath, R. (2025). “Transformative dynamics of the gig economy: Technological impacts, worker well-being and global research trends.” International Journal of Engineering Business Management, 17. https://doi.org/10.1177/18479790241310362
James, A. (2022). Women in the gig economy: feminising ‘digital labour.’ Work in the Global Economy, 2(1), 2–26. https://doi.org/10.1332/273241721X16448410652000
Khanom, M. T. (2023). Using social media marketing in the digital era: A necessity or a choice. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147- 4478), 12(3), 88–98. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v12i3.2507
KhosraviNik, M. (2022). Digital meaning-making across content and practice in social media critical discourse studies. Critical Discourse Studies, 19(2), 119–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2020.1835683
Kopf, S. (2025). Unravelling social media critical discourse studies (SM-CDS)–four approaches to studying social media through the critical lens. Critical Discourse Studies, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2025.2463622
Lestari, P., & Sihombing, L. H. (2022). The representation of south korean culture and history in the moon lovers: Scarlet Heart Ryeo TV series. IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 10(1), 478–488. https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v10i1.2695
Mardiyah, Z. (2023). Analisis etnografi virtual fenomena cancel culture tokoh publik media sosial Indonesia (Studi etnografi pada media Youtube dan Instagram selama periode Maret 2022-April 2023). Number, 2(10), 2023–2054. (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Yudharta).
Moody-Ramirez, M., Byerly, C., Mishra, S., & Waisbord, S. R. (2023). Media representations and diversity in the 100 years of journalism & mass communication quarterly. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 100(4), 826-846. https://doi.org/10.1177/10776990231196894
Nugroho, O. A., Hastjarjo, S., & Kurniawan, Y. E. (2025). Digital communication strategy of Instagram @ chinese _ server in deconstructing anti-Chinese sentiment. Jurnal ASPIKOM, 10(1), 127–146. http://dx.doi.org/10.24329/aspikom.v10i1.1605
Omar, A. S., & Ondimu, K. O. (2024). The Impact of Social Media on Society: A Literature Review. The International Journal of Engineering and Science (IJES), 13(6), 96–106. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2024/v50i41334
Rohim, S. (2024). Connectivity of digital marketing communication strategy between tourism facilities and interests. Jurnal ASPIKOM, 9(2), 381–394. http://dx.doi.org/10.24329/aspikom.v9i2.1545
Rosaliza, M., Asriwandari, H., & Indrawati, I. (2023). Field work: Etnografi dan etnografi digital. Jurnal Ilmu Budaya, 20(1), 74–103. https://doi.org/10.31849/jib.v20i1.15887
Roy, G., & Shrivastava, A. K. (2020). Future of gig economy: Opportunities and challenges. IMI Konnect, 9(1), 14–25. ISSN 2321 – 9378. https://imikonnect.imik.edu.in/uploads/issue_file/3590503Mod_imiKonnect_January_March_2020.pdf
Santoniccolo, F., Trombetta, T., Paradiso, M. N., & Rollè, L. (2023). Gender and media representations: A review of the literature on gender stereotypes, objectification and sexualization. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20105770
Scholz, T. (Ed.). (2012). Digital labor: The internet as playground and factory (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203145791
Steinberg, M., & Zhang, L. (2025). Platform capitalisms and platform cultures. 28(1), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/13678779231223544
Thunberg, S., & Arnell, L. (2022). Pioneering the use of technologies in qualitative research–A research review of the use of digital interviews. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 25(6), 757–768. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2021.1935565
Wiener, M., Cram, W. A., & Benlian, A. (2023). Algorithmic control and gig workers: a legitimacy perspective of Uber drivers. European Journal of Information Systems, 32(3), 485–507. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2021.1977729
Wood, A. J., & Lehdonvirta, V. (2023). Platforms disrupting reputation: precarity and recognition struggles in the remote gig economy. Sociology, 57(5), 999–1016. https://doi.org/10.1177/00380385221126804
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24329/aspikom.v10i2.1695
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License











