Experiencing multicultural awareness and affective polarization: A phenomenological inquiry

Mahfud Anshori, Chatarina Heny Dwi Surwati

Abstract


This study examines how Generation Z students experience multicultural awareness and navigate affective polarization in both everyday life and digital spaces. Using a Heideggerian phenomenological design, it explores how students emotionally respond to cultural, ethnic, and religious differences encountered in their social interactions. Participants were purposively selected from a culturally diverse university in Surakarta, Indonesia, and interviewed in depth. Hermeneutic analysis reveals that students often face emotional ambivalence, tension, and fatigue when engaging with pluralism, leading them to adopt strategies such as emotional withdrawal, selective silence, or ethical self-restraint. At the same time, moments of empathy, recognition, and relational openness emerged as meaningful turning points. These findings show that polarization stems not only from ideological cleavages but also from lived emotional experiences. The study concludes that fostering emotional literacy and ethical reflection is essential in preparing young people to engage meaningfully with difference in increasingly plural and polarized societies.


Keywords


Affective Polarization, Multicultural Awareness, Phenomenology, Political Communication

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ali, D. J., & Eriyanto, E. (2021). Political polarization and selective exposure of social media users in Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik, 24(3), 268. https://doi.org/10.22146/jsp.58199

Asfar, A. S., Asfar, M., Firdauz, D. L., Wicaksana, I. G. W., Ida, R., & Aribowo, A. (2025). Understanding the Jokowi effect during Indonesia’s 2024 presidential election: An integrative model of incumbency advantage. Cogent Social Sciences, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2025.2484470

Bengtsson, S., & Johansson, S. (2022). The meanings of social media use in everyday life: Filling empty slots, everyday transformations, and mood management. Social Media + Society, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051221130292

Berger, V. (2023). Mediatized love: A materialist phenomenology of Tinder. Social Media + Society, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231216922

Childs, C., & Holland, F. (2022). Young peoples’ lived experiences of shifts between face-to-face and smartphone interactions: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. Journal of Youth Studies, 27(1), 57–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2022.2101356

Elislah, N. (2023). Discourse network analysis on delaying elections in President Joko Widodo’s era. Jurnal ASPIKOM, 8(2), 225–240. https://doi.org/10.24329/aspikom.v8i2.1255

Fox, C. A., & Menchik, J. (2023). Islamic political parties and election campaigns in Indonesia. Party Politics, 29(4), 622–635. https://doi.org/10.1177/13540688221091656

Frankenberger, R., & Buhr, D. (2020). “For me democracy is …” meanings of democracy from a phenomenological perspective. Zeitschrift Für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft, 14(4), 375–399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12286-020-00465-2

Fuchs, C. (2013). Political Economy and Surveillance Theory. Critical Sociology, 39(5), 671–687. https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920511435710

Garzia, D., da Silva, F. F., & Maye, S. (2023). Affective polarization in comparative and longitudinal perspective. Public Opinion Quarterly, 87(1), 219–231. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfad004

Gushevinalti, G., & Renaningtias, N. (2025). The popularity of political persuasive messages among beginner voters about the 2024 election content on social media posts. Jurnal ASPIKOM, 9(2), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.24329/aspikom.v9i2.1440

Harakan, A., Pelizzo, R., & Kuzenbayev, N. (2023). Traditional beliefs and electoral behavior in Indonesia. World Affairs, 186(4), 896–924. https://doi.org/10.1177/00438200231203005

Hariani, B. (2022, March 9). Melihat miniatur kerukunan beragama Indonesia di Universitas Sebelas Maret. eduwara.com. https://eduwara.com/melihat-miniatur-kerukunan-beragama-indonesia-di-universitas-sebelas-maret

Haryanto, H., Irwan, A. I. U., & Amaliah, Y. (2024). Elections, governance, and polarization in Indonesian villages. Asian Journal of Political Science, 32(2), 175–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/02185377.2024.2351400

Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time (John Macquarrie & Edward Robinson Trans.). Blackwell Publishers Ltd (Original work published 1927).

Ida, R., Mashud, M., Saud, M., Yousaf, F. N., & Ashfaq, A. (2025). Politics in Indonesia: Democracy, social networks and youth political participation. Cogent Social Sciences, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2024.2432071

Iyengar, S., Lelkes, Y., Levendusky, M., Malhotra, N., & Westwood, S. (2018). The origins and consequences of affective polarization in the United States. Annual Review of Political Science, 22(1), 129–146. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051117-073034

Iyengar, S., Sood, G., & Lelkes, Y. (2012). Affect, not ideology: A social identity perspective on polarization. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76(3), 405–431. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfs038

Karim, A. M., Wibawa, A., & Arisanto, P. T. (2020). Partisipasi politik pemilih pemula di media sosial (Studi deskriptif tingkat dan pola politik partisipatif Gen-Z Kota Yogyakarta melalui pemanfaatan aplikasi Instagram tahun 2019). Paradigma Polistaat:Junrnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Illmu Politik, 3(2), 116–131. https://doi.org/10.23969/paradigmapolistaat.v3i2.3093

Klykken, F. H. (2022). Implementing continuous consent in qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 22(5), 795–810. https://doi.org/10.1177/14687941211014366

Kurniawan, T. (2024). UNS gagas wisata kampus Benteng Pancasila: Toleransi tak hanya dibicarakan. Surakarta Daily. https://surakarta-daily.com/berita-uns-gagas-wisata-kampus-benteng-pancasila-toleransi-tak-hanya-dibicarakan-981

Laverty, S. M. (2003). Hermeneutic phenomenology and phenomenology: A comparison of historical and methodological considerations. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 2(3), 21–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690300200303

Nordbrandt, M. (2023). Affective polarization in the digital age: Testing the direction of the relationship between social media and users’ feelings for out-group parties. New Media & Society, 25(12), 3392–3411. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211044393

Paolucci, C. (2024). A semiotic lifeworld. Semiotics and phenomenology: Peirce, Husserl, Heidegger, Deleuze, and Merleau-Ponty. Semiotica, 2024(260), 25–43. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2024-0152

Purboyo, M. G., Junaidi, J., & Amriwan, A. (2024). Ekskalasi partisanship politik dalam pembentukan polarisasi pada masyarakat digital (Studi pada platform media sosial TikTok). Sosiologi: Jurnal Ilmiah Kajian Ilmu Sosial Dan Budaya, 26(1), 27–45. https://doi.org/10.23960/sosiologi.v26i01.1220

Putri, N. A. D., Setiyono, B., Yuwono, T., & Erowati, D. (2023). Affective polarization: Not always between ingroup vs outgroup (Evidence from Twitter conversation with keywords Jokowi and PDIP). E3S Web of Conferences, 440, 03013. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202344003013

Renström, E. A., Bäck, H., & Carroll, R. (2021). Intergroup threat and affective polarization in a multi-party system. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 9(2), 553–576. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.7539

Rupp, A., Gitto, P., & McGrann, K. (2021). The relationship between informational outlets and understanding: An exploration of political knowledge among Generation Z. Journal of Student Research, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v10i2.1426

Satriadi, Y., Yusuf, S., & Hasan, A. S. (2023). The influence of media exposure on voters’ behavior during the Sumbawa 2020 local election (PILKADA). Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 39(1), 425–440. https://doi.org/10.17576/JKMJC-2023-3901-24

Setianto, W. A. (2023). Banality of political communication in Indonesian presidential election contestation. Jurnal ASPIKOM, 8(2), 343–356. https://doi.org/10.24329/aspikom.v8i2.1335

Sujoko, A. (2020). Satirical political communication 2019 Indonesia’s presidential election on social media. Informasi, 50(1), 15–29. https://doi.org/10.21831/informasi.v50i1.30174

Svenaeus, F. (2022). The Hermeneutics of Medicine and the Phenomenology of Health. In Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics (Vol. 97, Issue 4). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-07281-9

Syahputra, I., Fajar Riyanto, W., Dian Pratiwi, F., & Lusri Virga, R. (2024). Escaping social media: The end of netizen’s political polarization between Islamists and nationalists in Indonesia? Media Asia, 51(1), 62–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/01296612.2023.2246726

Syaputra, Y., Agustono, B., & Pujiati, P. (2024). Choosing democracy: The 1955 general election in Medan, Indonesia. Paramita: Historical Studies Journal, 34(1), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.15294/paramita.v34i1.42943

Tarsidi, D. Z., Suryadi, K., Budimansyah, D., & Rahmat, R. (2023). Social media usage and civic engagement among Indonesian digital natives: An analysis. Jurnal Civics: Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan, 20(2), 257–269. https://doi.org/10.21831/jc.v20i2.60812

Tyler, M., & Iyengar, S. (2023). Learning to dislike your opponents: Political socialization in the era of polarization. American Political Science Review, 117(1), 347–354. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000305542200048X

Wasisto, A., & Pahlevi, I. (2024). Dampak perbedaan partisan terhadap tingkat disafeksi politik di media sosial: Studi kasus pencalonan Gibran Rakabuming. Politica, 15(1), 21–39. https://doi.org/10.22212/jp.v15i1.4360

Yilmaz, İ., Triwibowo, W., Bachtiar, H., & Barton, G. (2024). Competing Populisms, Digital Technologies and the 2024 Elections in Indonesia. European Center for Populism Studies. https://doi.org/10.55271/pp0029

Yulianto, J. E., & Thenarianto, J. J. (2020). Cebong dan kampret: Simbolisme politik dan representasi polarisasi sosial pada pemilihan presiden 2019 di Indonesia. In Psikologi dan integrasi bangsa: Seri sumbangan pemikiran psikologi untuk bangsa (pp. 209–234). Himpunan Psikologi Indonesia.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24329/aspikom.v10i1.1620

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


     

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Web Analytics