Women as Opinion Leaders within Community (A Model of Feminism Perspective)

Lasmery RM Girsang

Abstract


Jakarta still faced many social problems. One of them related to urban settlement so that rusunawa was created to be a solution. In the beginning-unfortunately-the government’s policy had resulted in rejection among people living under the poverty line. It was caused by the difficulty of changing old habits from the previous location to a new situation. Besides that, phycological and economic burdens added serious problems for marginalized people. It happened until some women were aware of such a situation and put effort into the community. As a critical paradigm, this article discussed the Feminist Communication Theory to seek the role of voice in the construction of inequality and oppression. By using qualitative research, the results showed that through feminine transformative leadership, the informants were pushed to have abilities to communicate, dialogue, persuade, and influence the community to lead the community for having a new life world.


Keywords


Community; Feminism; Gender; Leadership; Transformative

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ardill, A. (2013) ‘Australian Sovereignty, Indigenous Standpoint Theory and Feminist Standpoint Theory First Peoplesʼ Sovereignties

Matter’, Griffith Law Review, 22(2), pp. 315–343. doi: 10.1080/10383441.2013.10854778.

Babbie, E. (2013) The Practice of Social Research. 13th edn. Wadsworth.

Baxter, J. (2018) Women Leaders and Gender Stereotyping in the UK Press. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-64328-1.

Billing, Y. D. and Alvesson, M. (2000) ‘Questioning the Notion of Feminine Leadership: A Critical Perspective on the Gender Labelling of Leadership’, Gender, Work and Organization, 7(3), pp. 144–157. doi: 10.1111/1468-0432.001030.

Cooper, K. and White, R. E. (2012) Qualitative Research in the Post-Modern Era. 1st edn. Springer Netherlands. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-2339-9.

Crotty, M. (2006) The Foundations of Social Research. Meaning and Perspective in the Research Process. 1st edn. Canberra: Sage Publication Inc.

Eagly, A. H. and Heilman, M. E. (2016) ‘Gender and Leadership: Introduction to the Special Issue’, Leadership Quarterly, 27(3), pp. 349–353. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.04.002.

Farganis, S. (1986) ‘Social Theory and Feminist Theory: THe Need for Dialogue’, Sociological Inquiry, 56(1), pp. 590–601. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-682X.1986.tb00075.x.

Fisher, K. and Robbins, C. R. (2015) ‘Embodied Leadership: Moving from Leader Competencies to Leaderful Practices’, Leadership, 11(3), pp. 281–299. doi: 10.1177/1742715014522680.

Fonow, M. M. and Cook, J. A. (2005) ‘Feminist Methodology: New Applications in the Academy and Public Policy’, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 30(4), pp. 2211–2236. doi: 10.1086/428417 .

Girsang, L. R. (2017) ‘Opini Perempuan sebagai Bagian Kelompok Masyarakat Pascaprogram Penertiban Pemukiman Kampung Pulo dan Kalijodo di Jakarta’, in Prosiding Konferensi Nasional Komunikasi. Jakarta: Ikatan Sarjana Komunikasi Indonesia.

Girsang, L. R., Sihabudin, A. and Ronda, M. (2018) ‘Indonesian Women’s Struggle Towards Transformation: A Case from “Rusunawa” Community’, Asian Social Science, 14(10), pp. 38–45. doi: 10.5539/ass.v14n10p38.

Jónasdóttir, A. G. and Jones, K. B. (2008) The Political Interests of Gender Revisited: Redoing Theory and Research with a Feminist Face. London: Manchester University Press.

Mackay, F. (2015) ‘Radical Feminism’, Theory, Culture & Society, 32(8), pp. 332–336. doi: 10.1177/0263276415616682.

Mahmudah, Z. (2019) ‘Pekerja Perempuan di Tambang: Bentuk Negosiasi Kesetaraan Gender dalam Dunia Kerja Maskulin’, Jurnal ASPIKOM, 3(6), p. 1228. doi: 10.24329/aspikom.v3i6.413.

Miller, K. (2005) Communication Theories. Perspective, Processes and Contexts. 2nd edn. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Mosedale, S. (2014) ‘Women’s Empowerment as a Development Goal: Taking a Feminist Standpoint’, Journal of International Development, 26, pp. 1115–1125. doi: 10.1002/jid.3050.

Neuman, W. L. (2013) Metodologi Penelitian Sosial: Pendekatan Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif. 7th edn. Jakarta: PT Indeks.

Potter, E. (2006) Feminism and Philophy of Science. London: Routledge.

Rahardjo, T., Dwiningtyas, H. and Pradekso, T. (2018) ‘Komunikasi “Penyesuaian Diri Kembali” Pekerja Migran Perempuan yang Kembali ke Daerah Asal’, Jurnal ASPIKOM, 3(5), p. 817. doi: 10.24329/aspikom.v3i5.308.

Rakow, L. F. and Wackwitz, L. A. (2004) Feminist Communication Theory. Selections in Context. California: Sage Publication Inc.

Salim, A. (2006) Teori dan Paradigma Penelitian Sosial. 2nd edn. Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana.

Sarros, J. C., Cooper, B. K. and Hartican, A. M. (2006) ‘Leadership and Character’, Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 27(8). doi: 10.1108/01437730610709291.

Stuhlmacher, A. F. and Walters, A. E. (1999) ‘Gender Differences in Negotiation Outcome: A Meta-analysis’, Personnel Psychology, 52(3), pp. 653–677. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1999.tb00175.x.

Tong, R. (1997) Feminist Thought. A Comprehensive Introduction. London: Routledge.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24329/aspikom.v5i1.546

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Jurnal ASPIKOM indexed by:
 
 
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License