Internet Access and the Potential in Facilitating Online Political Communication of Disabled

Nurul Hasfi, Joyo NS Gono, Wiwid Noor Rakhmad


Researchers defined Internet as a medium for overcoming the social exclusion of marginal groups, including the disabled. The increasing of the internet penetration in Indonesia should be an opportunity for the group to build inclusive elections. However, in the Indonesian context, non-disabled still controls virtual political space. This paper identifies the potential of the internet as a means of online political participation of disabled groups. Using the case study method in the context of 2018 Central Java Pilgub, researchers conducted in-depth interviews with the disabled, election organizers and disabled educational institutions in the Semarang city. The findings of the study indicate that certain diffables (physical, deaf and mild disabilities) have access to the internet, however there is no access to the interactive political communication. The internet has not functioned optimally as an Assistive Technology (AT) mainly caused by digital divide; skepticism to the internet and limited internet literacy.


Disabled; Inclusive Elections; Internet Access; Online Political Communication

Full Text:



APJII. (2018). Penetrasi & Profil Perilaku Pengguna Internet Indonesia. In Apjii.

Armando, A. (2014). The greedy giants: Centralized television in post-authoritarian Indonesia. International Communication Gazette.

Dahlberg, L. (2011). Re-constructing digital democracy: An outline of four “positions.” New Media and Society.


Fraser, N. (1993). Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy (pp. 109–142). pp. 109–142. Routledge.

Gil de Zúñiga, H., Molyneux, L., & Zheng, P. (2014). Social media, political expression, and political participation: Panel analysis of lagged and concurrent relationships. Journal of Communication.

Gustomy, R. (2017). Partisipasi Politik Difabel Di 2 Kota. IJDS : Indonesian Journal of Disability Studies, 4(1), 51–62.

Halalai, M. R. (2016). Pemenuhan Hak Politik Penyandang Disabilitas Sesuai Dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 2016 Tentang Penyandang Disabilitas Oleh Komisi Pemilihan Umum ( Kpu ) Kota Yogyakarta Skripsi Diajukan Kepada Fakultas Syar I ’ Ah Dan Hukum Universitas Islam Negeri S. PROGRAM STUDI ILMU HUKUM FAKULTAS SYARI’AH DAN HUKUM UNIVERSITAS ISLAM NEGERI SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA.

Hasfi, N., Usman, S., & Santosa, H. P. (2017). Representasi Kepemimpinan Calon Presiden Di Twitter. Jurnal ASPIKOM, 3(2), 270–284.

I Gusti Gede Made Gustem Lasida. (2017). MEMBANGUN PEMILU INKLUSIF UNTUK DIFABEL (Studi Kasus Pilwali Kota Yogyakarta 2017). Repository.Unair.Ac.Id.

Jaeger, P. T. (2009). Developing Online Community Accessibility Guidelines for Persons With Disabilities and Older Adults. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 55–63.

Lim, M. (2017). Freedom to hate: social media, algorithmic enclaves, and the rise of tribal nationalism in Indonesia. Critical Asian Studies, 49(3), 411–427.

Macdonald, S. J., & Clayton, J. (2013). Back to the future, disability and the digital divide. Disability and Society.

Maftuhin, A. (2016). Mengikat Makna Diskriminasi: Penyandang Cacat, Difabel, dan Penyandang Disabilitas. INKLUSI.

Merly, M. (2016). Aksesabilitas Pemilu 2014 dan Implikasinya terhadap Ketahanan Politik (Studi Tentang Persepsi Mahasiswa Penyandang Disabilitas Di Pusat Layanan Difabel UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta). Jurnal Ketahanan Nasional.

Nugroho, Y., Putri, D. A., & Laksmi, S. (2012). Mapping the Landscape of the Media Industry in Contemporary Indonesia. In Report series: Engaging Media, Empowering Society: Assessing media policy and governance in Indonesia through the lens of citizens’ rights.

Owuor, J., Larkan, F., & MacLachlan, M. (2017). Leaving no-one behind: using assistive technology to enhance community living for people with intellectual disability. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology.

Papacharissi, Z. (2002). The virtual sphere: The internet as a public sphere. New Media and Society.

Papacharissi, Z. (2004). Democracy online: Civility, politeness, and the democratic potential of online political discussion groups. New Media and Society.

Perangin-angin, L. L. K., & Zainal, M. (2018). Partisipasi Politik Pemilih Pemula Dalam Bingkai Jejaring Sosial Di Media Sosial. Jurnal ASPIKOM, 3(4), 737.

Ridder, H.-G. (2012). Yin , Robert K .: Case Study Research . Design and Methods. Zeitschrift Für Personalforschung.

Rubaii-Barrett, N., & Wise, L. R. (2008). Disability access and e-government: An empirical analysis of state practices. Journal of Disability Policy Studies.

Schur, L., Shields, T., Kruse, D., & Schriner, K. (2002). Enabling democracy: Disability and voter turnout. Political Research Quarterly.

Sourbati, M. (2012). Disabling communications? A capabilities perspective on media access, social inclusion and communication policy. Media, Culture and Society.

Sudibyo, A., & Patria, N. (2013). The Television Industry in Post-authoritarian Indonesia. Journal of Contemporary Asia.

UNICEF. (2017). Access To the Internet and Digital Literacy.

Van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2012). Digital democracy: Vision and reality. Innovation and the Public Sector.

Ward, A., Baker, P. M. A., & Moon, N. W. (2009). Ensuring the enfranchisement of people with disabilities. Journal of Disability Policy Studies.

Yang, H. “Chris,” & DeHart, J. L. (2016). Social Media Use and Online Political Participation Among College Students During the US Election 2012. Social Media and Society.



  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Web Analytics