MODEL KOMUNIKASI ANTAR BUDAYA KELUARGA MIXED MARRIAGE DI WILAYAH BUDAPEST-HUNGARIA

Zikri Fachrul Nurhadi, Heri Hendrawan, Desyya Fira Ayutria

Abstract


This study aims to discover the motives, experiences, meaning, and intercultural communication of mixed marriage couples in the Budapest-Hungary. The research uses phenomenology method Alfred Schutz and Husserl to examine the experience of people. Data are collected through observation, interviews through social media and literature study. The subjects are six mixed marriage couple living in Budapest-Hungary using purposive sampling technique. This research found a model of intercultural communication among mixed marriage couples related to motives, experiences, meanings, and intercultural communication based on cultural differences, languages, mindsets, as well as stereotypes of certain religions in which mixed marriage couples can adapt to the situation. This study contributes to four communication models of mixed marriage couples, namely motives, experiences, meanings and intercultural communication.


Keywords


Komunikasi, Antarbudaya, Keluarga, Mixed Marriage, Fenomenologi

References


Bedner, A. & Van Huis, S. (2010). Plurality of Marriage Law And Marriage Registration For Muslims In Indonesia: A Plea For Pragmatism. Journal Utrecht Law Review. 6(2), 175-191.

De Vito, J. A. (2001). The Interpersonal Communication Book. Edisi Ke-9. New York: Longman.

Jones, G & Shen, Hsiu-hua. (2010). International marriage in East and Southeast Asia: Journal trends and research emphases. Citizenship Studies,12(1), 9-25.

Jolene, Koester. (2011). Intercultural Compe tence: Interpersonal Commu nication Accros Cultures. USA: Allyn And Bacon.

Karel, Rivika, Sakti, dkk. (2014). Komunikasi Antarpribadi Pada Pasangan Suami Istri Beda Negara. Journal Acta Diurna, Volume III Nomor 4, 2014, Hal. 1-14.

Kuswarno, Engkus. (2009). Fenomenologi. Bandung: Widya Padjajaran.

Lewis, R, Jr & Ford, Robertson, J. M. (2010). Understanding The Occurrence Of Interracial Marriage In The United States Through Differential Assimilation. Journal of Black Studies, 41, 10-24.

Liliweri, Alo. (2007). Makna Budaya dalam Komunikasi Antar Budaya. Yogyakarta: LKI.

Morgan, Charlie V. (2013). Intermarriage Across Race and Ethnicity Among Immigrants. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 35(5), 243.

Mulyana, Deddy & Rahmat, Jalaluddin. (2003). Komunikasi Antarbudaya. Edisi Ke-7. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Nurhadi, Zikri Fachrul & Yandini, Sheila. (2016). Konstruksi Makna Perkawinan Campuran Bagi Perempuan Muslim Indonesia. Jurnal Penelitian Komunikasi, Volume 19 Nomor 1, Juli, Hal. 83-94.

Pratamawaty, Benazir, Bona, dkk. (2018). Model Konstruksi Makna Peran dan Posisi Perempuan Indonesia Pelaku Kawin Campu. Jurnal Komunikasi ASPIKOM, Volume 3 Nomor 4, Januari, Hal. 700-711.

Pue, G. H., & Sulaiman, N. (2013). “Choose One!”: Challenges of Inter-Ethnic Marriages in Malaysia. Journal Asian Social Science, 9(17), p 269.

Puspowardani, Rulliyanti. (2008). Komunikasi antar budaya dalam keluarga kawin campur Jawa-Cina di Surakarta. Tesis. Program Studi Ilmu Komunikasi, Program Pascasarjana. Universitas Sebelas Maret.

Romano, Dugan. (1998). Intercultural Marriage, Promises and Pitfalls. Maine: Intercultural Press, Inc.

Samovar, Larry, A & Richard, E, Porter & Edwin R. McDaniel. (2010). Communication Between Cultures. Belmont: Thomson Higher Education.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24329/aspikom.v3i6.331

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


     

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Web Analytics