Examining Perceived Risk and Behavioral Intention in the Context of COVID-19 Pandemic

I Gusti Lanang Agung Kharisma Wibhisono, Ummi Salamah

Abstract


An individual’s subjective assessment of the probability of negative consequences could influence the willingness to perform certain behaviors. Previous literature had identified socio-psychological factors that influence behavioral intention in various contexts. However, their influence on perceived risk and behavioral intention in a pandemic is rarely discussed. Using quantitative approach, empirical data were obtained through a survey of Denpasar citizens aged 17-30 (n=212) and analyzed using the PLS-SEM method. The result suggests that perceived risk could be influenced by interpersonal discussion, trust in institutions, and information-seeking ability. Meanwhile, efficacy belief and perceived risk could influence the intention to wear masks. On the other hand, media and internet exposure do not show significant influence on perceived risk.


Keywords


Perceived Risk, Behavioral Intention, COVID-19, Health Communication, Risk Communication

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adhani, A., Anshori, A., & Mahardika, A. (2022). Public Attitudes towards the Government’ s Policy Communication in Preventing COVID-19. 7(1), 61–70.

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

Berry, D. (2007). Health communication: Theory and practice. Open University Press.

Bish, A., & Michie, S. (2010). Demographic and attitudinal determinants of protective behaviours during a pandemic: A review. British Journal of Health Psychology, 15(4), 797–824. https://doi.org/10.1348/135910710X485826

BPS RI. (2020). Perilaku Masyarakat di Masa Pandemi COVID-19: Hasil Survei Perilaku Masyarakat di Masa Pandemi COVID-19 (7-14 September 2020).

CDC. (2020). Considerations for Wearing Masks. CDC. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/prevent-getting-sick/cloth-face-cover-guidance.html

Chaiken, S. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(5), 752–766. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.752

Choi, D., Yoo, W., Noh, G., & Park, K. (2018). Exploring Risk Perception and Intention to Engage in Social and Economic Activities During the South Korean MERS Outbreak. International Journal of Communication, 12(2018).

Dryhurst, S., Schneider, C. R., Kerr, J., Freeman, A. L. J., Recchia, G., van der Bles, A. M., Spiegelhalter, D., & van der Linden, S. (2020). Risk perceptions of COVID-19 around the world. Journal of Risk Research, 0(0), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2020.1758193

Ferrer, R. A., & Klein, W. M. P. (2015). Risk perceptions and health behavior. Current Opinion in Psychology, 5, 85–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.03.012

Grasso, K. L., & Bell, R. A. (2015). Understanding Health Information Seeking: A Test of the Risk Perception Attitude Framework. Journal of Health Communication, 20(12), 1406–1414. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2015.1018634

Guan, M., Coles, V. B., Samp, J. A., Sales, J. M. D., DiClemente, R. J., & Monahan, J. L. (2016). Incorporating Communication into the Theory of Planned Behavior to Predict Condom Use Among African American Women. Journal of Health Communication, 21(9), 1046–1054. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2016.1204383

Hair, Joe F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202

Hair, Joseph F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd Editio). SAGE Publications.

Hanusch, F., & Nölleke, D. (2019). Journalistic Homophily on Social Media: Exploring journalists’ interactions with each other on Twitter. Digital Journalism, 7(1), 22–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2018.1436977

Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8

Huang, Q. (2020). How Does News Media Exposure Amplify Publics’ Perceived Health Risks About Air Pollution in China? A Conditional Media Effect Approach. International Journal of Communication, 14(0), 20.

Karolina, C. M., & Zarkasi, I. R. (2022). Pros and Cons of Vaccine Refusal in Social Media. 7(1), 98–111.

Lapor COVID-19. (2020a). Warga DKI Kurang Siap Menghadapi New Normal. Lapor COVID-19. https://laporcovid19.org/warga-dki-kurang-siap-menghadapi-new-normal/

Lapor COVID-19. (2020b). Warga Surabaya Belum Siap Menghadapi Pelonggaran Pembatasan Sosial. Lapor COVID-19. https://laporcovid19.org/warga-surabaya-belum-siap-menghadapi-pelonggaran-pembatasan-sosial/

Larsman, P., Eklöf, M., & Törner, M. (2012). Adolescents’ risk perceptions in relation to risk behavior with long-term health consequences; antecedents and outcomes: A literature review. Safety Science, 50(9), 1740–1748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2012.04.009

Lin, C. A., & Lagoe, C. (2013). Effects of News Media and Interpersonal Interactions on H1N1 Risk Perception and Vaccination Intent. Communication Research Reports, 30(2), 127–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2012.762907

Lin, T. T. C., Li, L., & Bautista, J. R. (2017). Examining How Communication and Knowledge Relate to Singaporean Youths’ Perceived Risk of Haze and Intentions to Take Preventive Behaviors. Health Communication, 32(6), 749–758. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2016.1172288

Littlejohn, S. W., & Foss, K. A. (2009). The encyclopedia of communication theories. SAGE Publications.

Littlejohn, S. W., Foss, K. A., & Oetzel, J. G. (2017). Theories of human communication (11th ed.). Waveland Press, Inc.

Nugraheny, D. E. (2020). Survei BPS Perilaku 3M Belum Diterapkan Konsisten oleh Masyarakat. Kompas.Com.

Pask, E. B., & Rawlins, S. T. (2016). Men’s Intentions to Engage in Behaviors to Protect Against Human Papillomavirus (HPV): Testing the Risk Perception Attitude Framework. Health Communication, 31(2), 139–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2014.940670

Record, R. A. (2017). Tobacco-Free Policy Compliance Behaviors among College Students: A Theory of Planned Behavior Perspective. Journal of Health Communication, 22(7), 562–567. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2017.1318984

Rimal, R. N., Böse, K., Brown, J., Mkandawire, G., & Folda, L. (2009). Extending the purview of the risk perception attitude framework: Findings from HIV/AIDS prevention research in Malawi. Health Communication, 24(3), 210–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410230902804109

Rimal, R. N., & Juon, H. S. (2010). Use of the risk perception attitude framework for promoting breast cancer prevention. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40(2), 287–310. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2009.00574.x

Rimal, R. N., & Real, K. (2003). Perceived risk and efficacy beliefs as motivators of change: Use of the risk perception attitude (RPA) framework to understand health behaviors. Human Communication Research, 29(3), 370–399. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/29.3.370

Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Becker, J.-M. (2015). SmartPLS 3.

Rosidin, I. (2020). Jerinx SID Demo Tanpa Masker, Pemprov Bali Tidak Punya Kewenangan Beri Sanksi. Kompas.Com.

Schiavo, R. (2007). Health Communication: From Theory to Practice. Jossey-Bass.

Shi, J., & Kim, H. K. (2020). Integrating Risk Perception Attitude Framework and the Theory of Planned Behavior to Predict Mental Health Promotion Behaviors among Young Adults. Health Communication, 35(5), 597–606. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2019.1573298

Sukardi, M. (2020). Jerinx Ditahan, Intip Lagi Aksi Anti-Masker hingga Tolak Rapid Test Covid-19. Okezone.Com. https://www.okezone.com/tren/read/2020/08/12/620/2261198/jerinx-ditahan-intip-lagi-aksi-anti-masker-hingga-tolak-rapid-test-covid-19?page=1

Thomas, R. K. (2006). Health Communication. Springer.

Thompson, T. L. (2014). Encyclopedia of Health Communication. SAGE Publications.

Tim SPBE Provinsi Bali. (2020). Data Penyebaran Covid-19 Di BALI Sampai Dengan 2020-08-30. Tim SPBE Provinsi Bali. https://pendataan.baliprov.go.id

Waters, E. A., McQueen, A., & Cameron, L. D. (2014). Perceived Risk and its Relationship to Health-Related Decisions and Behavior. In L. R. Martin & M. R. DiMatteo (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Health Communication, Behavior Change, and Treatment Adherence (pp. 193–213). Oxford University Press.

WHO. (2020a). Pertanyaan dan jawaban terkait Coronavirus. WHO.

WHO. (2020b). Risk communication and community engagement readiness and response to coronavirus disease (COVID-19): interim guidance, 19 March 2020. WHO. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/risk-communication-and-community-engagement-readiness-and-initial-response-for-novel-coronaviruses

WHO. (2020c). WHO Director-General’s opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID-19 - 11 March 2020. WHO. https://www.who.int/dg/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-covid-19---11-march-2020

Wu, X., & Li, X. (2017). Effects of mass media exposure and social network site involvement on risk perception of and precautionary behavior toward the haze issue in China. International Journal of Communication, 11, 3975–3997.

Xin, M., Luo, S., She, R., Chen, X., Li, L., Li, L., Chen, X., & Lau, J. T. F. (2021). The impact of social media exposure and interpersonal discussion on intention of COVID-19 vaccination among nurses. Vaccines, 9(10), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/VACCINES9101204

Yang, Q., & Wu, S. (2019). How Social Media Exposure to Health Information Influences Chinese People’s Health Protective Behavior during Air Pollution: A Theory of Planned Behavior Perspective. Health Communication, 00(00), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2019.1692486

Zhao, X., & Cai, X. (2009). The role of risk, efficacy, and anxiety in smokers’ cancer information seeking. Health Communication, 24(3), 259–269. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410230902805932




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24329/aspikom.v7i2.1103

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


     

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License